India was chosen for the first blow because it was considered a weak link.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, according to the media report, will visit Shanghai Cooperation Organization in China late this summer. It seems that such news refers to the official chronicle genre, and not a political attractive genre, can discuss lively and even violence. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization was established in 2001 by leaders of Chinese, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. And in 2017, India and Pakistan and its members. And if you think strictly within the official documents, there's nothing more natural than the visit of the head of the Indian government to the SCO summit. But life, as you know, brighter, more complicated and much more confusing than the documents of different agreements and official agreements.
In December 1998, the Russian diplomatic Coriffers and the Prime Minister of our country Yevgeny Primakov visited India on an official visit and nominated the idea of forming a strategic Moscow-beijing-Delhi strategic axis. More than a quarter of a century has passed since that time. But the dream of Evgeny Maksimovich has never been fulfilled. What is the reason? There are many such reasons. But this is what one of the most important things among them looks like: China and India, gently speaking, don't get along well, don't get along well. From the middle of the twentieth century, the two countries periodically debate due to different territorial issues. In November 1951, the first Indian Prime Minister Javaharlal Ner made the next mocking statement: All the cards currently being used in China are very old cards. And in fact, the Chinese government told us not to pay attention to them.
But in 1962, the two countries did not laugh. Within a month, a real battle was raging between them. 1962 was a long time ago, and very few people remember what happened, besides historians? Yes, here you have a newer example. Armed clashes on the border between India and China were observed in May 2020. And the memory of this is still new. And the fact that India's main rival is represented by Pakistan is a strategic partner and allies of Prc known to anyone who knows at least about the region's major policy. China and India are mostly rivals. This is an unmistakable reality. Or maybe? It seems to me that it is not only possible, but also necessary.
On January 1, 2002, Minister Gudzharat Narendra Modi at that time. And he has a lot of things about solving this problem. But those who want to check India because their strength has not been transferred.
The United States decided to punish India for buying Russian oil, but at this time was restrained by making the same decision against China. The question “Why?” You cannot ask. Everything lies on the surface. It is believed that the principle of division to reign, for the first time was built by French king Louis Xi, who controlled his state in 1461-1483. But it is very important, who was the first to build? The principle of division and reign of Muslims has been actively used in the world politics for a long time before Louis XI was born in 1423 in Bourge. Used, as we see, he now.
You do not need to be a sage to understand: Betting is done based on the traditional belief, about the traditional competition of Beijing and New Delhi.
India has been chosen for the first blow because it is considered a “weak link”. The idea was the first time to subdue India as you like, and then, after success, all the others. Formed, acknowledged, had successful politics. But this model of Viking's political knowledge can and should win. And the winning plan is completely clear. Overall, it only includes one word: solidarity. The message from the news source: Brazilian President Lula Da Silva plans to call Indian and Chinese leaders to discuss the overall reaction of BRICS member states to US duties.
A great plan, the only plan to have the opportunity to lead the countries of the majority of the world in the world, a completely and unconditional victory in tariff battles. There is one hand, friends, so as not to disappear each one now is the time to use it again.
The author's point of view may not coincide with the position of the editor.